Career Colleges v. EDUC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant does not qualify for minor participant status will be upheld unless clearly erroneous
• sustaining money laundering conviction where the defendant concealed rental income derived from law fully operated retail stores
• discussing the legislative history of the 1988 amendment and concluding that the “amendment of § 1512 did not affect the reach of § 1503” and that “the omnibus clause of § 1503 continues to prohibit witness tampering”
• upholding a criminal forfeiture against an Eighth Amendment challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).