Capellen v. Capellen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “[b]ecause suits for divorce ... are not common law causes of action, but are statutorily created and regulated proceedings designed to meet the changing desires and needs of the people in a dynamic society, the ‘open courts’ provision has no application”
• finding no incurable judicial bias where judge made comments that were at best “mildly prejudicial” and which did not warrant reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).