Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 12/14/1994
Capellen v. Capellen
Citations
- 888 S.W.2d 539
- 1994 WL 622146
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding “[b]ecause suits for divorce ... are not common law causes of action, but are statutorily created and regulated proceedings designed to meet the changing desires and needs of the people in a dynamic society, the ‘open courts’ provision has no application”
- finding no incurable judicial bias where judge made comments that were at best “mildly prejudicial” and which did not warrant reversal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barajas, Koehler, Larsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Moroch v. CollinsTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2005-11-03· cited 251×
- Kimsey v. KimseyTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1998-03-12· cited 115×
- Grossnickle v. GrossnickleTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1996-10-10· cited 115×
- Jenkins v. JenkinsTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2000-04-06· cited 114×
- Zorilla v. WahidTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-07-18· cited 101×
- Sandone v. Miller-SandoneTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2003-07-31· cited 100×
- in Re Commitment of Dennis Ray StutevilleCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-03-10· cited 85×
- Henry v. HenryTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-06-07· cited 72×
- Johnson v. JohnsonTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1997-06-09· cited 53×
- Sprick v. SprickTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1999-06-24· cited 47×
- Diaz v. DiazTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2011-06-22· cited 45×
- EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION v. Kinder Morgan Operating LPTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-02-21· cited 36×
- In Re MabrayTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-10-14· cited 32×
- Waite v. WaiteTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-11-21· cited 22×
- Foxx v. American TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1996-06-19· cited 15×
- In re the Expunction of S.D.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2010-11-17· cited 15×
- In the Interest of M.E.C.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-12-12· cited 14×
- Miguel Reyes v. Norma ReyesTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2014-12-11· cited 10×
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ReeceTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-10-18· cited 6×
- In the Interest of J.K.B. and Minor ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-06-26· cited 2×
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1985-12-04· cited 6,606×
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court· 1951-12-05· cited 4,309×
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court· 1965-11-03· cited 3,215×
- Murff v. MurffTexas Supreme Court· 1981-04-29· cited 988×
- Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court· 1950-12-06· cited 567×
- Roberson v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court· 1989-04-19· cited 559×
- Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court· 1951-05-09· cited 549×
- Stafford v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court· 1987-02-18· cited 479×
- Jacobs v. JacobsTexas Supreme Court· 1985-04-03· cited 372×
- Collora v. NavarroTexas Supreme Court· 1978-11-29· cited 356×
- Carle v. CarleTexas Supreme Court· 1950-11-29· cited 337×
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ScharrenbeckTexas Supreme Court· 1947-10-01· cited 325×
- Point Lookout West, Inc. v. WhortonTexas Supreme Court· 1987-12-02· cited 318×
- Rose v. Doctors HospitalTexas Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 232×
- Bell v. BellTexas Supreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 229×
- Allright, Inc. v. PearsonTexas Supreme Court· 1987-05-13· cited 156×
- Worsham Steel Co. v. AriasTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1992-05-20· cited 130×
- Lemons v. EMW Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1988-02-17· cited 104×
- Wade v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'NTexas Supreme Court· 1951-12-05· cited 86×
- State Farm Lloyds, Inc. v. PolasekTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1992-12-16· cited 85×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.