Skip to main content
· 12/5/1951

Wade v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'N

Citations

  • 244 S.W.2d 197
  • 150 Tex. 557
  • 1951 Tex. LEXIS 406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the rule requiring timely objection to improper argument in order to preserve error, has been applied even to improper argument making strong appeals to prejudice, which the courts have held become harmless when a jury is instructed to disregard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.