Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/4/1987
Cantu v. State
Citations
- 738 S.W.2d 249
- 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 507
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that complainants pay closer attention than casual bystanders
- rejecting defendant’s argument that his due process rights were violated where he had to choose between testifying in order to rebut the State’s introduction of an extraneous offense and retaining his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination
- “No constitutional violation is presented by the fact of a difficult decision for a defendant.”
- “Therefore, repeated showings of appellant’s picture in several arrays was suggestive.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Clinton, Miller, Duncan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
108 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lagrone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-02-05· cited 911×
- Barley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-06-21· cited 487×
- Vaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-09-11· cited 375×
- Delk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-04-21· cited 366×
- Goldberg v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-08-22· cited 170×
- Benitez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1999-11-10· cited 129×
- Soria v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-09-11· cited 91×
- Cagle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2000-07-06· cited 88×
- Grunsfeld v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1991-06-04· cited 82×
- Santos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-09-23· cited 79×
- Wright v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-11-17· cited 71×
- May v. United Services Ass'n of AmericaTexas Supreme Court· 1993-01-20· cited 68×
- Soto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-01-26· cited 41×
- Nathan G. Mims v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-04-24· cited 41×
- Brown v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-07-26· cited 38×
- Loving v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1997-05-22· cited 37×
- Ruben Montoya Cantu v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1992-07-22· cited 31×
- Kos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2000-04-06· cited 30×
- Burns v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1996-06-27· cited 29×
- Aviles-Barroso v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-08-27· cited 23×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1980-06-10· cited 1,359×
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 1,077×
- Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-04-01· cited 1,048×
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-04-28· cited 735×
- Aliff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-02-03· cited 255×
- Brumfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-03-19· cited 200×
- Mann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-10-22· cited 151×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-06-10· cited 140×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-09-21· cited 121×
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-10-24· cited 86×
- Santiago v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-09-22· cited 52×
- Ginther v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-07-11· cited 26×
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1962-01-10· cited 21×
- Levell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-04-22· cited 16×
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1963-10-09· cited 6×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-09-28· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.