Campbell v. Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that 1 de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not 2 otherwise.’”
• “Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that || de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not 2|| otherwise.’”
• “Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that || de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not otherwise.’”
• “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s 1 || report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
• Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine
  Supreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
• Daniel Howard Bee v. Dr. Keith Greaves, Medic Keith Hughes and Dr. Robert Greer
  Tenth Circuit· 1984-09-24· cited 374×
• Spraque v. Thorn Americas, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-11-24· cited 242×
• Shirley NULF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., a New York Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
  Tenth Circuit· 1981-01-05· cited 117×