Skip to main content
· 11/10/1998

Campbell v. Walker

Citations

  • 28 F. Supp. 2d 1216
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19301
  • 1998 WL 853047

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that 1 de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not 2 otherwise.’”
  • “Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that || de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not 2|| otherwise.’”
  • “Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that || de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not otherwise.’”
  • “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s 1 || report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vanbebber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.