Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/27/2004
Campbell v. State
Citations
- 149 S.W.3d 149
- 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1802
- 2004 WL 2390117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating first prong of Rousseau/Royster test is satisfied if lesser-ihcluded offense is within the proof necessary to establish the charged offense
- a distinct criminal act from the offense charged cannot be a lesser-included offense
- a distinct criminal act from the offense charged cannot be a lesser-included offense
- smaller, but different drug stash
- smaller, but different drug stash
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meyers, Keller, Price, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Womack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lucio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-09-14· cited 574×
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-03-29· cited 289×
- Bufkin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-01· cited 247×
- Hayward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-03-02· cited 142×
- Ex Parte AmadorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-10-13· cited 87×
- Horne v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2007-06-19· cited 78×
- Shea v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-06-14· cited 65×
- Brandon Lynn Darkins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-04-29· cited 60×
- Girdy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-01· cited 56×
- Worthy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-09· cited 41×
- Farrakhan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-05-02· cited 36×
- Baca v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2006-08-01· cited 29×
- Ortega v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-11-22· cited 29×
- Archie v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2006-01-03· cited 28×
- Phillips v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-12-07· cited 24×
- Williams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2010-05-19· cited 19×
- Isaac v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-05-26· cited 14×
- Powell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2006-09-27· cited 13×
- Girdy v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2005-10-18· cited 12×
- Landry v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2007-06-05· cited 12×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-02-24· cited 1,521×
- Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-09-23· cited 763×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-06-10· cited 698×
- Sledge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-10· cited 527×
- Banda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-14· cited 397×
- Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-04· cited 359×
- Parrish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-01-26· cited 243×
- Jacob v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-02-01· cited 213×
- Ex Parte GoodbreadCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-03-25· cited 160×
- Cunningham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-03-18· cited 144×
- Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-10-22· cited 141×
- Luna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-04-04· cited 98×
- Hanks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-06-23· cited 96×
- Ford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-03-08· cited 89×
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-05-21· cited 85×
- Porter v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1994-02-11· cited 80×
- Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-10-06· cited 75×
- Sutton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-06-07· cited 44×
- Hanks v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2003-03-27· cited 41×
- Upchurch v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2000-06-23· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.