Upchurch v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding appellant was entitled to lesser charge of possession
• holding appellant was entitled to lesser charge of possession
• holding appellant was entitled to lesser charge of possession
• holding appellant was entitled to lesser charge of possession
• “The evidence above, when considered as a whole and under the controlling standard of review, raises more than a scintilla of evidence that appellant was guilty only of possession and had no intent to deliver.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).