Skip to main content

Day v. State

Citations

  • 532 S.W.2d 302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the offense of criminal trespass is a lesser[-]included offense of all three types of burglary,” and stating generally that “the elements of criminal trespass, including ‘notice,’ could be established by proof of the same facts necessary to prove the offense of Meru – 5 burglary”
  • laying out the elements of criminal trespass as including remaining on property or in a building
  • disapproved of on other grounds by Hall v. State, 225 S.W.3d 524, 527–31 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)
  • “it is difficult to imagine a situation where a person would recklessly enter a building or habitation and commit or attempt to commit a felony or theft”
  • appellant testified he entered restaurant to investigate what appeared to be a break-in
  • op. on reh = g

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion, Roberts, Odom, Douglas, Morrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

240 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.