Campbell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that as used in section 12.42(a), “felony” and “state jail felony” are mutually exclusive
• noting that the legislature’s use of language in one section of the Penal Code but not another was intentional
• “In analyzing the language of a statute, we assume that every word has been used for a purpose . . . .”
• under section 12.42(a) of the Texas Penal Code, “the terms ‘felony’ and ’state jail felony’ are mutually exclusive”
• In construing a statute, “we assume that every word has been used for a purpose and that each word, phrase, clause, and sentence should be given effect if reasonably possible.”
• In construing a statute, “we assume that every word has been used for a purpose and that each word, phrase, clause, and sentence should be given effect if reasonably possible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ex Parte Spann
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-04-21· cited 162×
• Cuellar v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-02-13· cited 135×
• Parrott, Ex Parte Jimmie Mark Jr.
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-01-09· cited 129×
• Tapps v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-09-30· cited 120×
• Mahaffey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-30· cited 89×
• Aguilar v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-02-23· cited 61×
• Perez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-08-16· cited 47×
• Gipson, Raimond Kevon
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-04-16· cited 33×
• LaPointe v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-06-08· cited 31×
• Tapps v. State Tex.
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-06-06· cited 31×
• Broussard v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-01-10· cited 29×
• Harris v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-05-07· cited 28×
• Fite v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-10-25· cited 27×
• Jamie Lee Bledsoe v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2015-11-03· cited 18×
• Tyrone Tucker v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-05-06· cited 16×
• Con Mahn Pham v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2015-05-14· cited 14×
• In re Q.D.M.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-06-14· cited 13×
• Nixon v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2004-08-31· cited 11×
• David Samaripas Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2013-01-17· cited 9×
• Rylander v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-03-06· cited 6×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boykin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-09· cited 1,829×
• State v. Hardy
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-01-14· cited 312×
• Gibson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-06-30· cited 141×
• State v. Mancuso
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-02-21· cited 120×
• State v. Webb
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-03-01· cited 87×
• Campbell v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-09-23· cited 16×