Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 3/3/2020

Campbell v. Facebook, Inc.

Citations

  • 951 F.3d 1106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assessing whether plaintiffs established 11 standing for injunctive relief under the ECPA, 18 U.S.C. § 2520, even though the statute provides 12 for preliminary and other equitable relief
  • the 16 fact that the settlement was “the result of four in-person, arms-length mediations before 17 two different mediators” supported final approval
  • “An injunctive-relief-only class settlement, by 15 16 definition, has no fund into which any fees not awarded by the court could possibly revert.”
  • first quoting Spokeo, 578 U.S. at 341–42, and then citing Eichenberger v. ESPN, 11 Inc., 876 F.3d 979, 983–84 (9th Cir. 2017)
  • a district court “may consider some or all” of the Churchill factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Campbell v. Facebook, Inc.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.