Skip to main content
· 2/27/2015

Theodore H. Frank v. Netflix, Inc.

Citations

  • 779 F.3d 934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the contingent nature of litigation 17 remains a relevant factor to evaluate a request from the common fund
  • finding the contingent nature of litigation remains a relevant factor to 16 evaluate a request from the common fund
  • approving 5 13 $5,000 incentive awards where individual class members each received $12
  • approving $5,000 incentive awards 11 where individual class members each received $12

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Reinhardt, George

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.