Camire v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court properly rejected the plaintiff’s “continuing treatment” theory because “the treatment was not continuous by the same doctor (or an associate) or the same hospital for the required period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Camire v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Camire v. United States
  N.D. New York· 1980-05-23· cited 8×
• Camire v. United States
  Second Circuit· 1976-06-02