Liffengren v. Bendt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• continued treatment by the doctor the patient was referred to for follow-up care could not be imputed to the defendant doctor without a principal-agent or master-servant relationship, particularly where the defendant had nothing more to do with patient’s care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).