Skip to main content

Cameron v. State

Citations

  • 615 So. 2d 121
  • 1992 WL 330663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court's instruction entitled the defendant to a new trial because the instruction \tended to bolster\ the State's evidence and \to disparage the defense theory of the case\
  • trial court erred by giving hypothetical example that tended to bolster testimony of State's witness and to disparage defense theory of the case
  • conviction reversed due to the trial court's hypothetical example which tended to bolster the State's case and to disparage the defense theory of the case
  • \It is well-settled that 'the instructions of the court in a criminal prosecution must not invade the province of the jury.' \ (quoting 23A C.J.S. Criminal Law § 1293 at 198 (1989))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.