Ex Parte Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court's instruction was improper because the court's \summary of only the State's evidence amounted to a factual determination\ and \could reasonably have been taken to advocate the State's version of the evidence\
• trial court erred by summarizing disputed evidence from the State's viewpoint and then instructing jury to render verdict of guilt if it believed that summary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tucker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1994-06-17· cited 9×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-12-01· cited 8×
• Cameron v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-11-13· cited 7×
• Riley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-03-21· cited 6×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-05-17
• William Darby v. State of Alabama
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2023-03-24

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harris v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-04-20· cited 43×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-07-28· cited 14×
• Austin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-11-17· cited 13×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-04-08· cited 8×
• Pease v. City of Montgomery
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1976-06-01· cited 7×