Cameron v. Cameron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting movant has burden to produce evidence of net income if necessary for the success of his motion to modify
• noting movant has burden to produce evidence of net income if necessary for the success of his motion to modify
• by failing to present complaint to trial court, father waived argument that ordered child support was so high it did not permit him to pay necessary living expenses
• “As movant, it was appellant’s burden to show the requisite material and substantial change in circumstances since the entry of the previous order.”
• by failing to present complaint to trial court, father waived argument that ordered child support was so high it did not permit him to pay necessary living expenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In the Interest of C.C.J.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2008-02-14· cited 114×
• Fulgham v. Fischer
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2011-07-29· cited 95×
• Sink v. Sink
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2012-05-09· cited 74×
• Hinkle v. Hinkle
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2007-05-29· cited 67×
• Alexander v. Rogers
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2008-03-05· cited 35×
• Jeffrey Leibovitz and Sequoia Frankford Springs 23, L.P. v. Sequoia Real Estate Holdings, L.P.
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2015-05-29· cited 35×
• In the Interest of M.A.S.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2007-09-18· cited 34×
• In the Interest of J.D.D.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2008-01-08· cited 33×
• Thornton v. Dobbs
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2011-07-29· cited 33×
• Darocy v. Abildtrup
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2011-05-26· cited 27×
• Melton v. Toomey
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2011-06-01· cited 24×
• First National Collection Bureau, Inc. v. Walker
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2011-07-14· cited 23×
• In the Interest of A.M.W.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2010-05-25· cited 22×
• Smith-Gilbard v. Perry
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2011-02-07· cited 20×
• In the Interest of M.J.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2006-08-18· cited 19×
• Bledsoe Dodge, L.L.C. v. Kuberski
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2009-04-20· cited 17×
• Phan v. Addison Spectrum L.P.
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2008-02-07· cited 15×
• In the Interest of J.G.L.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2009-08-28· cited 12×
• In the Interest of D.A.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2010-03-10· cited 11×
• Double Diamond, Inc. v. Saturn
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2011-04-05· cited 10×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• London v. London
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-11-14· cited 143×
• Niskar v. Niskar
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2004-06-15· cited 131×
• Knight v. Knight
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2004-02-05· cited 35×