Cameron County v. Tompkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• identifying claims as including (1) the court's concern over Attorneys' conduct underlying Father's motion for sanctions; (2) the court's comments and tone, indicating a \blatant distaste for [Attorneys]\; (3) the court's concern over the magnitude of Attorneys' fees; and (4
• finding the trial court’s judgment “complied in every respect with section 452.375.6” when, unlike in this case, the judgment “set forth the statutory custody factors [listed in section 452.375.2] and analyzed the evidence in light of each factor at some length”
• claim for recusal insufficient where movant makes no claim judge relied on extrajudicial source in making any ruling
• \ Francis v. Wieland \ -the first appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).