Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/20/1986
Camer v. Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Citations
- 45 Wash. App. 29
- 723 P.2d 1195
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Contentions unsupported by argument or citation of authority will not be considered on appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pekelis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 2002-12-12· cited 230×
- Mohr v. GrantWashington Supreme Court· 2005-03-24· cited 102×
- In Re Marriage of WallaceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-05-10· cited 71×
- Milligan v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-03-15· cited 69×
- In re the Marriage of WallaceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-05-10· cited 69×
- Schmalenberg v. Tacoma News, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-09-02· cited 58×
- Demopolis v. Peoples National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-09-04· cited 55×
- Moffatt v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court· 1988-03-11· cited 47×
- State v. 119 Vote No! CommitteeWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-11· cited 47×
- Life Designs Ranch, Inc. v. Michael SommerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-11-12· cited 42×
- Hecker v. CortinasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-03-29· cited 42×
- Johnson v. MermisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-05-18· cited 41×
- Dworkin v. L.F.P., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1992-09-18· cited 36×
- Ernst Home Center, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers International UnionCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-01-09· cited 26×
- Margoles v. HubbartWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-15· cited 25×
- Valdez-Zontek v. Eastmont School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-01-12· cited 25×
- Spence v. FlyntWyoming Supreme Court· 1991-08-08· cited 21×
- Lee v. the Columbian, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-12-26· cited 21×
- Hoppe v. Hearst Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-03-20· cited 21×
- Sisley v. Seattle School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-07-30· cited 18×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 4,525×
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 937×
- Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsSupreme Court· 1986-04-21· cited 858×
- Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert NovakD.C. Circuit· 1984-12-06· cited 402×
- The Washington Post Company v. Eugene J. KeoghD.C. Circuit· 1966-07-28· cited 300×
- Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1983-05-26· cited 251×
- Mark v. Seattle TimesWashington Supreme Court· 1981-11-12· cited 198×
- Gregory v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Supreme Court· 1976-07-23· cited 178×
- Information Control Corporation v. Genesis One Computer Corporation, Etc.Ninth Circuit· 1980-01-15· cited 147×
- Taskett v. King Broadcasting Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1976-02-11· cited 127×
- Dunlap v. WayneWashington Supreme Court· 1986-03-27· cited 110×
- Sims v. Kiro, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-05-30· cited 55×
- Exner v. American Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-12-09· cited 28×
- Rye v. Seattle Times CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-03-12· cited 21×
- Benjamin v. Cowles Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-07-20· cited 21×
- Spelson v. CBS, INC.N.D. Illinois· 1984-03-08· cited 18×
- Styner v. EnglandCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-05-13· cited 14×
- Top Line Equipment Co. v. National Auction Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1982-08-02· cited 12×
- Stuart v. Gambling Times, Inc.D. New Jersey· 1982-01-08· cited 8×
Other cases named Camer v. Seattle Post-Intelligencer
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.