· 9/4/1990
Demopolis v. Peoples National Bank
Citations
- 796 P.2d 426
- 59 Wash. App. 105
- 1990 Wash. App. LEXIS 348
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming dismissal of CPA claim predicated on allegedly defamatory remarks made by adverse party's attorney
- affirming dismissal of CPA claim predicated on allegedly defamatory remarks made by adverse party’s attorney
- plaintiff filed CPA claim against bank's attorney, challenging competency and strategy, concerning litigation over plaintiff's father's estate
- plaintiff filed CPA claim against bank’s attorney, challenging competency and strategy, concerning litigation over plaintiff’s father’s estate
- “Fite seemingly limits a client’s liability for his or her attorney’s defamatory communications to situations in which the attorney acted within the scope of employment, and with the client’s knowledge and consent”
- communicant and recipient were opponents in litigation communicating outside courtroom
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Winsor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.