· 9/9/2002
Cambridge Technologies, Inc. v. Argyle Industries, Inc.
Citations
- 807 A.2d 125
- 146 Md. App. 415
- 48 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 966
- 2002 Md. App. LEXIS 154
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- parties’ “contract was set forth in Purchase Order”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Salmon, Sharer, Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.