Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where practical court should exclude particular assumptions or other aspects of expert testimony which considered individually do not meet minimum of probative value
• a buyer's conduct under [section 2-607(3)(a)] must satisfy the Code’s standard of commercial good faith
• code dispenses with rigid notice requirement which may deny an uninformed consumer of an otherwise valid claim
• “... notice under section 2-607 need not be a specific claim for damages or an assertion of legal rights.”
• where practical court should exclude particular assumptions or other aspects of expert testimony which considered individually do not meet minimum of probative value
• “Congress intended to accord the Executive Branch great flexibility in molding its priorities policies to the frequently unanticipated exigencies of national defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).