Poole v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether a defendant's consecutive sentences arise from a single criminal episode depends upon factual evidence, and consequently cannot be raised in a rule 3.800 motion, but rather must be raised by way of a rule 3.850 motion
• “As a general rule, a post-conviction issue that requires an evidentiary hearing must be resolved under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-31· cited 13×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-16· cited 8×
• Rosier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-09· cited 6×
• Hodge v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-11-19
• McKenzie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-15
• White v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-22
• Gomez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-13

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Callaway v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-09-14· cited 38×
• Nowlin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-12· cited 19×
• Borders v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-07· cited 4×