Skip to main content

Calfarm Insurance v. Krusiewicz

Citations

  • 31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 619
  • 131 Cal. App. 4th 273
  • 2005 Daily Journal DAR 8854
  • 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6521
  • 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if an insurer's reasonableness depends on legal precedent, then the issue is reviewed de novo
  • holding that if an insurer’s reasonableness depends on legal precedent, then the issue is reviewed de novo
  • finding that an unjust enrichment claim does not allow for punitive 18 damages
  • finding no bad faith in denial of coverage to indemnify where there was a “mistaken or erroneous withholding of policy benefits, if reasonable or if based on a legitimate dispute as to the insurer’s liability.” (internal quotations and alterations omitted)
  • “If the conduct of the insurer in denying coverage was objectively reasonable, its subjective intent is irrelevant.”
  • “coverage decision was objectively reasonable in light of the unsettled 20 nature of the law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fybel, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.