Skip to main content
· 6/11/1954

Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.

Citations

  • 242 Minn. 354
  • 65 N.W.2d 122
  • 1954 Minn. LEXIS 652

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an accident is an “unexpected, unforeseen, or undesigned happening or consequence”
  • holding that “caused by accident” policy language applied to ongoing use of defective plaster product
  • defining “accident,” in the context of an accident policy, as “an unexpected, unforeseen, or undesigned happening or consequence from either a known or an unknown cause”
  • relying on policy exclusion directed at “any goods or products manufactured, sold, handled or distributed by the [ijnsured” in finding no coverage for damage to plaster that was defectively applied by the insured
  • unworkmanlike application of plaster on a building resulting in “property damage” not excluded because it was claimed that presence of faulty stucco reduced value of building containing faulty bricks
  • unworkmanlike application of plaster on a building resulting in \property damage\ not excluded because it was claimed that presence of faulty stucco reduced value of building containing faulty bricks

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.