Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 9/25/2012

Calderon v. King Umberto, Inc.

Citations

  • 892 F. Supp. 2d 456
  • 2012 WL 4356738
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The allegations contained in plaintiffs’ [c]omplaint concerning defendants’ failure to provide their employees with proper overtime compensation are sufficient at this preliminary stage to warrant authorizing notice for a three-year period.”
  • “The allegations contained in plaintiffs’ [c]omplaint concerning defendants’ failure to provide their employees with proper overtime compensation are sufficient at this preliminary stage to warrant authorizing notice for a three-year period.”
  • refusing to limit certification to positions held by named plaintiffs
  • refusing to limit certification to positions held by named plaintiffs
  • refusing to limit certification to positions held by named plaintiffs
  • refusing to limit certification to positions held by named plaintiffs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.