Robertson v. LTS Management Services LLC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that even if state law claims were duplicative, the FLSA does not preempt them “particularly when the FLSA contains a savings clause.”
• rejecting the defendant's argument that five affidavits did not prove the plaintiffs were similarly situated because they were all \conclusory and contain[ed] the same information\
• rejecting the defendant's argument that five affidavits did not prove the plaintiffs were similarly situated because they were all “conclusory and contain[ed] the same information”
• duplication of claims does not mean that plaintiffs’ state-law claim is preempted by their FLSA claim because the FLSA does not provide the exclusive remedy for its violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).