Skip to main content
· 9/16/2002

Calcutti v. SBU, INC.

Citations

  • 224 F. Supp. 2d 691
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17302
  • 2002 WL 31056801

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When there is a question of fact regarding the application of the continuous representation doctrine[,] defendant’s motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations must be denied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.