Skip to main content

Cain v. Cain

Citations

  • 334 N.E.2d 650
  • 3 Mass. App. Ct. 467
  • 1975 Mass. App. LEXIS 665

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • officer must disclose customer dissatisfaction to corporation before pursuing opportunity through separate company
  • whether an employee’s salary should be forfeited depends on the totality of the circumstances
  • corporate fiduciary who owned fifty percent of the shares in a close corporation was required to obtain the consent of the other shareholder before appropriating a corporate opportunity for himself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hale, Goodman, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.