Skip to main content
· 1/24/2001

Tomsic v. Lautieri (In Re Tri-Star Technologies Co.)

Citations

  • 257 B.R. 629
  • 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 47
  • 2001 WL 68226

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Massachusetts law because “the forfeiture remedy is not a penalty but really reimbursement of payment for services not properly performed . . . compensation is often apportioned in relation to services indeed properly performed”
  • forfeiture penalty is not a penalty but really reimbursement of payment for services not properly performed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry J. Boroff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.