Skip to main content
· 5/9/1951

Production MacHine Co. v. Howe

Citations

  • 99 N.E.2d 32
  • 327 Mass. 372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • director should have afforded his corporation, a manufacturer of polishing machinery, opportunity to acquire rights to saw sharpening machine
  • total forfeiture of compensation where the record was sparse as to the benefits conferred by the defendant’s services
  • the duty “to protect the interests of the corporation is a paramount duty and the personal pecuniary interest of the officer ... [is] subordinate to it”
  • machine to sharpen saw blades within plaintiff company’s capability and goal of enlarging field of manufacture
  • defendant failed to make “full disclosure which as a fiduciary he owed”
  • director obliged “reasonably to protect the interests of the corporation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Qua, Lummus, Spalding, Williams, Counihan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.