· 5/9/1951
Production MacHine Co. v. Howe
Citations
- 99 N.E.2d 32
- 327 Mass. 372
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- director should have afforded his corporation, a manufacturer of polishing machinery, opportunity to acquire rights to saw sharpening machine
- total forfeiture of compensation where the record was sparse as to the benefits conferred by the defendant’s services
- the duty “to protect the interests of the corporation is a paramount duty and the personal pecuniary interest of the officer ... [is] subordinate to it”
- machine to sharpen saw blades within plaintiff company’s capability and goal of enlarging field of manufacture
- defendant failed to make “full disclosure which as a fiduciary he owed”
- director obliged “reasonably to protect the interests of the corporation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Qua, Lummus, Spalding, Williams, Counihan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.