Cadle Co. v. Riggert (In Re Riggert)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court has no equitable power to extend the Rule 4004(a) deadline after the deadline has expired
• court has no equitable power to extend the Rule 4004(a) deadline after the deadline has expired
• “[T]he court finds that Cadle’s proposed amendments would, indeed, be an exercise in futility because of the . . . time restrictions in Bankruptcy Rule 4004.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).