· 10/8/2010
Byrne v. Rutledge
Citations
- 623 F.3d 46
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 20825
- 2010 WL 3928866
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a Vermont statute barring vanity plate that referred to a religion or deity was viewpoint discrimination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kearse, Raggi, Livingston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.