Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 4/29/1992
Butler v. State
Citations
- 91 Md. App. 515
- 605 A.2d 186
- 1992 Md. App. LEXIS 88
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the “moving party has the burden of proof’
- recognizing that the \moving party has the burden of proof\
- expressing the belief that, notwithstanding Powers and Ferrell, hung counts may lend \substantial circumstantial insight into what [the] jury probably did and probably did not decide\
- expressing the belief that, notwithstanding Powers and Ferrell, hung counts may lend “substantial circumstantial insight into what [the] jury probably did and probably did not decide”
- “Collateral estoppel ... is stubbornly factbound.”
- \Collateral estoppel ... is stubbornly factbound.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-09· cited 66×
- Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-27· cited 24×
- West v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-03· cited 23×
- Mason v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-04-14· cited 19×
- Stouffer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-12-03· cited 12×
- Higginbotham v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-03-29· cited 12×
- Gillis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-12-09· cited 11×
- Cunningham v. Baltimore Cnty.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-07-01· cited 9×
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. CarterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-29· cited 3×
- State v. WoodsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-04-12· cited 2×
- State v. BaxterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-05-29· cited 2×
Cites
62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 4,229×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 2,250×
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1937-12-06· cited 2,059×
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court· 1824-03-23· cited 1,814×
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-01-17· cited 1,616×
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court· 1949-04-25· cited 1,511×
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-17· cited 1,277×
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1938-03-07· cited 1,233×
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 1,095×
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-08· cited 1,084×
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1984-08-02· cited 1,064×
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 873×
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 720×
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 693×
- Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-01-12· cited 555×
- One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-12-11· cited 544×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.