Wisconsin Supreme Court· 6/20/2000

State v. Richter

Citations

2000 WI 58
612 N.W.2d 29
235 Wis. 2d 524
2000 Wisc. LEXIS 401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting categorical exigency rule in drunk driving cases premised on the dissipation of alcohol in the suspect's blood
the fact that the defendant was not a target of the search “was sufficient to allow Richter to freely consent to the search”
the fact that the defendant was not a target of the search \was sufficient to allow Richter to freely consent to the search\
\[The court of appeals is] bound by the most recent pronouncements of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.\
\[P]ursuit of a suspect known to be armed and dangerous would establish exigent circumstances implicating a threat to physical safety.\
\[P]ursuit of a suspect known to be armed and dangerous would establish exigent circumstances implicating a threat to physical safety.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sykes, Abrahamson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.