Butala v. Agashiwala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a fraudulent concealment claim where the “[c]omplaint [was] utterly lacking in the details of what steps the plaintiffs took to investigate the condition of their investment once they were on inquiry notice of the probability they had been defrauded”
• “Whatever duties the defendants owed to the plaintiffs, their alleged failure to disclose facts would not excuse the plaintiffs’ lack of diligence in investigating the facts of which they were unquestionably aware.”
• “Whatever duties the defendants owed to the plaintiffs, . . . their alleged failure to disclose facts would not excuse the plaintiffs’ lack of diligence in investigating the facts of which they were unquestionably aware.”
• “The plaintiffs’ argument that their cause of action did not accrue until their damages were ascertainable is premised on a misunderstanding of the difference between when an injury occurs and when the damages resulting from that injury are fully quantifiable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).