Skip to main content
· 4/7/1986

Anisfeld v. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 631 F. Supp. 1461
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that investors complaining of § 10(b) violations due to misrepresentation of occupancy rate were placed on inquiry note by the Investment Memorandum, financial statements, and correspondence
  • “The complaint in this case is insufficient since it fails to affirmatively allege the states of citizenship of each of the individual defendants and the principal places of business of each of the corporate defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Milton Pollack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.