Skip to main content

Burns v. State

Citations

  • 703 S.W.2d 649
  • 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1749

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that accomplice witness charge error requires reversal and remand for new trial
  • stating that a person who has been indicted for the same offense is an accomplice witness as a matter of law
  • stating that a person who has been indicted for the same offense is an accomplice witness as a matter of law
  • “This has been interpreted to require only that some harm have resulted to appellants because of the erroneous charge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Onion, Teague, Campbell, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.