· 3/15/1983
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Cole
Citations
- 189 Conn. 518
- 457 A.2d 656
- 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 944
- 1983 Conn. LEXIS 467
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing rebuttable presumption that letter mailed was received in due course
- “[b]ecause [the state] statute is modeled after [federal statutes], we may look to decisions under the federal law for guidance”
- ‘‘[a]n exhibit offered and received as a full exhibit is in the case for all purposes’’
- presumption that confirmation slip received in the due course of mail
- \a letterhead or billhead satisfies the signature requirement.\
- trial court properly discarded redundant interrogatory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parskey, Peteks, Healey, Parseey, Shea, Grillo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.