Skip to main content
· 3/15/1983

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Cole

Citations

  • 189 Conn. 518
  • 457 A.2d 656
  • 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 944
  • 1983 Conn. LEXIS 467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing rebuttable presumption that letter mailed was received in due course
  • “[b]ecause [the state] statute is modeled after [federal statutes], we may look to decisions under the federal law for guidance”
  • ‘‘[a]n exhibit offered and received as a full exhibit is in the case for all purposes’’
  • presumption that confirmation slip received in the due course of mail
  • \a letterhead or billhead satisfies the signature requirement.\
  • trial court properly discarded redundant interrogatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parskey, Peteks, Healey, Parseey, Shea, Grillo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.