Skip to main content
· 2/8/2001

Lloyd v. Butts

Citations

  • 37 S.W.3d 603
  • 343 Ark. 620
  • 2001 Ark. LEXIS 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining the test as whether there have been any material changes demonstrating that a modification is in the best interest of the child
  • defining the test as whether there have been any material changes demonstrating that a modification is in the best interest of the child
  • affirming a denial to change custody from a nonrelative to fit natural parents because the trial court had found there was not a material change in circumstances since the last custody award
  • although appellant raised res judicata as a defense below, the chancellor did not rule or rely on it in his final order; therefore, the court was unable to reach the issue on appeal
  • although appellant raised res judicata as a defense below, the chancellor did not rule or rely on it in his final order; therefore, the court was unable to reach the issue on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tom Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.