Burney v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that testimony as to statements by unidentified witnesses implicating defendant was inadmissable hearsay when offered to show the logical sequence of events.
• holding that testimony as to statements by unidentified witnesses implicating defendant was inadmissable hearsay when offered to show the logical sequence of events.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Norton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-12-24· cited 62×
• Rafael Andres v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2018-09-20· cited 19×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• State v. Baird
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-11-29· cited 92×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-07· cited 40×
• Hoffert v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-11· cited 10×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-29· cited 4×