Arizona Supreme Court· 9/28/1942
Burney v. Lee
Citations
- 129 P.2d 308
- 59 Ariz. 360
- 1942 Ariz. LEXIS 180
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing both the legislature and the courts can constitutionally exercise their powers in determining rules of procedure in courts
- identifying rule-making authority as \essentially judicial\ in nature and inherent in court's Article 6, Section 1 power
- identifying rule-making authority as “essentially judicial” in nature and inherent in court’s Article 6, Section 1 power
- courts have power to promulgate rules to fulfill constitutional mandates
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lockwood, McAlister, Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court· 2009-03-13· cited 116×
- Edwards v. YoungArizona Supreme Court· 1971-06-24· cited 67×
- J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-08-21· cited 65×
- Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court· 1966-12-22· cited 59×
- State v. BlazakArizona Supreme Court· 1969-12-08· cited 51×
- Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme CourtArizona Supreme Court· 2005-10-05· cited 34×
- Goldberg v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court· 1977-12-13· cited 30×
- González Vélez v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1953-12-30· cited 30×
- State Tax Commission v. Miami Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1952-07-14· cited 28×
- State v. LaneArizona Supreme Court· 1949-11-15· cited 22×
- State of Arizona v. PierceArizona Supreme Court· 1942-10-13· cited 21×
- Heat Pump Equipment Co. v. Glen Alden Corp.Arizona Supreme Court· 1963-04-24· cited 15×
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1947-02-24· cited 12×
- Del Castillo v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-06-11· cited 10×
- State v. FlingArizona Supreme Court· 1949-10-03· cited 10×
- Newton v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1945-05-28· cited 9×
- S. H. Kress & Co. v. EvansArizona Supreme Court· 1950-05-08· cited 8×
- Gonzales v. WhitneyArizona Supreme Court· 1961-12-27· cited 8×
- Sweeney v. Winslow Gas Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1946-01-14· cited 7×
- Arizona State Tax Commission v. Catalina Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-02-09· cited 3×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court· 1915-06-14· cited 734×
- State v. RoyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1936-07-21· cited 148×
- The People v. CallopyIllinois Supreme Court· 1934-10-24· cited 59×
- In Re City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court· 1938-05-09· cited 30×
- Byers v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court· 1935-08-02· cited 20×
- DeCamp v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1936-05-01· cited 19×
- Ernst v. LambSupreme Court of Colorado· 1923-03-05· cited 16×
Other cases named Burney v. Lee
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.