Skip to main content

Ayers v. State

Citations

  • 844 A.2d 304
  • 2004 Del. LEXIS 129
  • 2004 WL 527927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a specific unanimity instruction is not required in every case where a defendant may be convicted as a principal or as an accomplice” (emphasis in original)
  • “The standard of review for a denial of a requested jury instruction is de novo.”
  • “A specific unanimity instruction is required . . . if one count encompasses two separate incidents, either of which could support a defendant’s conviction for a particular charge.”
  • “A specific unanimity instruction is required . . . if one count encompasses two separate incidents, either of which could support a defendant’s conviction for a particular charge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Holland, Berger, Steele, Jacobs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.