· 10/9/1992
Burger King Corp. v. Austin
Citations
- 805 F. Supp. 1007
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16273
- 1992 WL 309059
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Florida Franchise Act to an in-state franchisor and out-of-state franchisee when parties' choice of law provision selected Florida law
- defining tort and finding that plaintiff had failed to state claim for conversion
- no fiduciary relationship where franchise agreement stated that franchisee was an independent contractor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoeveler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.