Skip to main content
· 10/9/1992

Burger King Corp. v. Austin

Citations

  • 805 F. Supp. 1007
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16273
  • 1992 WL 309059

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Florida Franchise Act to an in-state franchisor and out-of-state franchisee when parties' choice of law provision selected Florida law
  • defining tort and finding that plaintiff had failed to state claim for conversion
  • no fiduciary relationship where franchise agreement stated that franchisee was an independent contractor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoeveler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.