Special Purpose Accounts Receivable Cooperative Corp. v. Prime One Capital Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a certificate of title is not necessary to assert ownership over a motor vehicle
• reiterating the well-established rule that “[w]hether the defendant interferes with a contractual or business relationship, that defendant must be a third party or a stranger to the business relationship”
• “irreparable injury is presumed in cases involving tortious interference with business relationships. In such cases, irreparable injury need not be alleged or proven…”
• “Florida courts have divided this description into three elements: (1) an act of dominion wrongfully asserted; (2) over another’s property; and (3) inconsistent with his ownership therein.”
• “While it is true that a director or an officer is not personally liable for any act or failure to act regarding corporate management or policy, it does not follow that the officer or individual is shielded from accountability for tortious conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).