Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
S.D. New York· 9/23/2016

Buonasera v. Honest Co.

Citations

  • 208 F. Supp. 3d 555
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133846
  • 2016 WL 5812589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that plaintiff failed to establish standing to seek injunctive relief where he alleged “he would consider purchasing the products in the future if they were” changed
  • noting that courts should consider jurisdictional issues such as standing first in a motion to dismiss analysis
  • noting that “[c]ourts have generally held that since this second factor requires a reasonableness analysis, it cannot be resolved on a motion to dismiss”
  • finding that alleged misrepresentations about products purchased by class members but not the named plaintiff were “sufficiently similar” to the alleged misrepresentations concerning products purchased by named plaintiff
  • claiming that defendant's \natural\ products include synthetic and toxic ingredients
  • acknowledging split among district courts in the Second Circuit and concluding that plaintiff had sufficiently alleged class standing at the motion to dismiss stage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Buonasera v. Honest Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.