Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 5/1/1985
Wagner v. Wagner
Citations
- 329 S.E.2d 788
- 285 S.C. 430
- 1985 S.C. App. LEXIS 358
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where the family court has failed to make findings of fact with respect to each factor, a remand for further consideration is appropriate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gardner, Cureton, Goolsby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Voelker v. HillockCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-05-12· cited 13×
- McDuffie v. McDuffieSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-11-08· cited 12×
- McDuffie v. McDuffie Ex Rel. McDuffieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-05-11· cited 11×
- Kirsch v. KirschCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1989-07-31· cited 11×
- Bull v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-07-31· cited 8×
- Hickman v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-02-22· cited 7×
- Wagner v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-09-09· cited 7×
- Nicholson v. LewisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-05-23· cited 6×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Elam v. ElamSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-07-02· cited 100×
- Risinger v. RisingerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-04-03· cited 46×
- Marley v. KirbySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-06-19· cited 38×
- Millis v. MillisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-09-06· cited 16×
- Hughes v. HughesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-15· cited 16×
- Bentrim v. BentrimCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-07-06· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.