Skip to main content
· 2/17/1998

Buckner, Inc. v. Berkey Irrigation Supply

Citations

  • 951 P.2d 338
  • 89 Wash. App. 906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] timely served and filed motion for reconsideration satisfies the requirements of RAP 5.2(e
  • “[A] timely served and filed motion for reconsideration satisfies the requirements of RAP 5.2(e) and extends the time limit for filing the notice of appeal,” and “failure to note the motion at the time it is served and filed does not affect the extension of time for appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.