Washington Supreme Court· 5/9/1974
Deschenes v. King County
Citations
- 521 P.2d 1181
- 83 Wash. 2d 714
- 1974 Wash. LEXIS 950
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the only permissible action a court may take if it lacks subject matter jurisdiction is dismissal
- explaining the only permissible action a court may take if it lacks subject matter jurisdiction is dismissal
- superior court acting in appellate capacity has only such jurisdiction as is conferred by law
- superior court acting in appellate capacity has only such jurisdiction as is conferred by law
- purpose of time limitations in land use matters is to give finality; if there were not finality, no owner of land would ever be safe developing his property
- “The rule is well known and universally respected that a court lacking jurisdiction of any matter may do nothing other than enter an order of dismissal.” (citing 21 C.J.S. Courts § 118 (1940))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1999-02-04· cited 133×
- Dougherty v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court· 2003-09-25· cited 120×
- Dougherty v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 2003-09-25· cited 119×
- Hubbard v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2002-07-18· cited 94×
- Chelan County v. NykreimWashington Supreme Court· 2002-07-25· cited 93×
- Shoop v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2003-04-03· cited 76×
- Thurston County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 76×
- North Street Ass'n v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court· 2006-08-09· cited 75×
- Thurston County v. W. WASH. GROWTH MANAGEMENTWashington Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 74×
- Samuel's Furniture, Inc. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court· 2002-10-03· cited 73×
- Young v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court· 2003-04-03· cited 71×
- In Re Adoption of BuehlWashington Supreme Court· 1976-11-04· cited 69×
- Bridle Trails Community Club v. City of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-09-02· cited 69×
- Clark County Public Utility District No. 1 v. WilkinsonWashington Supreme Court· 2000-02-03· cited 65×
- Henderson Homes, Inc. v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court· 1994-07-21· cited 52×
- Residents Opposed Turbines v. State EfsecWashington Supreme Court· 2008-11-20· cited 50×
- Residents Opposed to Kittitas Turbines v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation CouncilWashington Supreme Court· 2008-11-20· cited 47×
- City of Federal Way v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-08-26· cited 41×
- Veradale Valley Citizens' Planning Committee v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-12-13· cited 41×
- SKAMANIA CTY. v. Columbia River Gorge Com'nWashington Supreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 37×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.