· 2/11/1987
Buckhorn, Inc. v. Ropak Corp.
Citations
- 656 F. Supp. 209
- 8 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1622
- 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1367
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- approving and disapproving of several golden parachutes under the Unocal standard
- approving and disapproving of several golden parachutes under the Unocal standard
- Unlike the circumstances in Revlon, Inc., the directors of Buckhorn [the target] did not commit themselves to the sale of the company or its assets
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kinneary
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.