Skip to main content
· 2/11/1987

Buckhorn, Inc. v. Ropak Corp.

Citations

  • 656 F. Supp. 209
  • 8 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1622
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving and disapproving of several golden parachutes under the Unocal standard
  • approving and disapproving of several golden parachutes under the Unocal standard
  • Unlike the circumstances in Revlon, Inc., the directors of Buckhorn [the target] did not commit themselves to the sale of the company or its assets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kinneary

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.